Skip to content

Design — a skill's loop and a fork read a cut response the way a turn does, and the Task tool names a cut fork (#115, #117)

Status: IMPLEMENTEDaimon-core (the new at.aimon.core.agent.budget.StalledIterationGuard; the cut-response and stall paths of LlmSkillExecutor, DefaultSubagentExecutor, OrcaAgentExecutor and ReActLlmDeriver; the Task tool's result; ChunkAggregator's parse WARN), one test comment in aimon-llm-anthropic, and the records: orca-executor.md §2.2, §5, §12 and §13, backlog L-22 and L-23 (closed), L-25 and L-26. Sources: issues #115 and #117.

§11, appended after the build, is where the build departs from this document. Everything between this header and §11 is the body as approved in design review round 2 (PASS, no blocking findings, four non-blocking notes), kept byte-exact rather than corrected — the house habit in this directory, for the reason ../llm/model-capability-binding-round-trip.md gives. Its file:line citations are at main c561e17. The review transcripts (review-1.md, review-2.md) and the run records the body names (TASK.md, $RUN_DIR/build/) are not in the repository; §11 reproduces what was measured.

It is in English, like its siblings in docs/design/agent-execution/; docs/design/ is not a translation target (docs/project/documentation-guide.md §5.1). It continues max-tokens-truncation-reporting.md, whose §11.3 registered the two backlog items this work closes. What this work left open is in ../../backlog/llm-config-surface-open-items.md, L-25 and L-26.

Run truncation-skill-loop-stall. Base main at c561e17 (the worktree HEAD, clean). Every file:line below was re-read at that commit unless it says otherwise. "Read" means established by reading source; "measured" means run. One unbilled measurement was made for this design (§2.5, Jackson in a scratch directory); no API call was made.

Revision 2 — after review-1.md. All six findings were accepted. Nothing was rebutted, so there is no rebuttal-1.md.

  • Blocking — D10 is re-decided. Revision 1 declined to commit a design record because the task then said not to edit docs/design/README.md. The task's section on #122 was amended at 2026-09-11T04:38Z: #122 is decided (the verbatim approved body wins), and a run that commits a record adds its index row, as babfc1a, 784ae2f and 5606b04 did. D10 now commits this design as docs/design/agent-execution/skill-loop-truncation-and-fork-stall.md, with a row in docs/design/README.md §2, and leaves §3 alone. §4.3, §8.2, §9 Q5 and §10 follow.
  • Non-blocking, all taken:
  • the proposed orca-executor.md §2.2 text no longer says the deriver gives "the same answer" or is ended by the stall guard — it only refuses cut calls (§4.3, D9);
  • D1 no longer claims parity with the executors for what a person sees: a turn's refused call emits lifecycle events the REPL prints, and a skill's never does (D1, §8.1 F-7, the L-22 closure);
  • D5's observable change names the side-effect approval gate, and so does the changelog bullet;
  • D7 omits the offset clause when getCharOffset() is negative;
  • §7.0 lists the existing tests whose tool calls fail across iterations that were checked against the wider guards, and requires the full aimon-core and aimon-workflow-graaljs suites.

1. The problem, in one paragraph

113 gave both agent executors one reading of a response cut at max_tokens (at.aimon.core.agent.budget.TruncatedResponses):

every tool call of a cut response is refused rather than run, a cut final answer is marked and ends TRUNCATED, and on a turn three refused responses in a row trip the stalled-iteration guard and end ERROR. Three places next to that change still answer differently. A skill invoked as a slash command runs its own loop in LlmSkillExecutor, which never reads the stop reason: a cut tool call runs with whatever arguments arrived and a cut final answer returns as a plain success (ReActLlmDeriver has the same loop and no construction site). A subagent fork refuses cut calls but has no stalled-iteration guard, so a fork whose every response is cut makes up to maxIterations (1000 by default, and no in-tree request budget) refused, max_tokens-sized requests; whatever CompletionReason a guard gives it is read by task records, workflow verdicts, skill forks and the Task tool. The Task tool prints Status: SUCCESS for a fork cut at max_tokens, leaving the parent model only the marker at the end of the summary. Four smaller records items from #113's review come with it: a WARN that logs whole tool arguments, a CHANGELOG.md claim no test pins, a design section that describes classes that were never built, and a test comment that over-claims.


2. What the code does today (read at c561e17)

2.1 Every tool loop in main sources

Census: git grep -n 'hasToolUses()' -- 'modules/*/src/main/**', keeping the calls made on an LlmResponse (the rest are Message.hasToolUses() in compaction, codecs and provider converters, none of which loops). Exactly four loops:

Loop Where Reads the stop reason Stall guard What bounds it Reachable
Turn OrcaAgentExecutor.executeReActLoop:1725 yes yes — :1818-1828, threshold :233 = 3 agent maxIterations, request budget yes
Fork DefaultSubagentExecutor.runReActLoop:447 yes no — class javadoc says so (:104-105), and refuseTruncatedToolUses' javadoc (:824-826) subagent maxIterations (SubagentMetadata.java:26, default 1000); the one main-source SubagentExecutionRequest.builder() (DefaultSubagentExecutionManager.java:617) sets no budget yes
Skill LlmSkillExecutor.execute — loop :185-217, while at :191 no no skill max-iterations (SkillMetadata.java:54, default 100); no budget yes — new LlmSkillExecutor( twice, DefaultCommandExecutionManager.java:123, :145; LlmSkillExecutor::new zero; OrcaAgentExecutorFactory.createDefaultCommandExecutionManager (:866-868, called at :650) builds the :123 one
Deriver ReActLlmDeriver.derivefor at :188, dispatch at :216 no no DEFAULT_MAX_ITERATIONS = 6 (:122) and the token budget no — the name ReActLlmDeriver appears in no main source outside its own file, in any module (searched as new ReActLlmDeriver(, ReActLlmDeriver::new and the bare name). Tests only: ReActLlmDeriverTest, ToolExecutionGateArchitectureTest, DeriverObservationCreateToolTest

Two more facts about the skill loop decide §3:

  • Nobody can stop it. OrcaAgentExecutor.executeCommand's own comment: "Nothing trips this one today — a slash command is not interruptible" (:2024-2026), and LlmSkillExecutor reads no cancellation signal.
  • It uses the blocking four-argument sendMessage (:185, :213), so the response comes from AnthropicLlmClient.convertResponse (:782-836), which maps the stop reason (:827-832) and WARNs Anthropic response was truncated due to max_tokens limit (:786). What a cut tool_use block looks like on that path is not measured (§9 Q1).

2.2 Where a skill's result goes

SkillExecutionResult is {success, response, error, metadata}. Its one consumer in main, SkillBackedCommandExecutor.toCommandResult (:83-94, command/**, not this run's), copies those four into CommandExecutionResult, which has no slot for a reason. OrcaAgentExecutor.executeCommandFlow (:1475-1510) commits getResponse() as the assistant message and returns OrcaAgentExecutionResult.success(...) or .failure(...) — so the turn reads COMPLETED or ERROR. A fork-mode skill already surfaces a cut fork as a success whose text ends in the marker: SubagentBackedSkillForkExecutor reads only isSuccess() (:123-126).

2.3 Who reads a fork's CompletionReason

Reader What it reads
SubagentExecutionResult getStatus() is success ? "SUCCESS" : "FAILURE" (:333-335); getSummary() is the answer on success, the error on failure (:321-323); getCompletionReason() javadoc (:340-355) calls budget stops the "needs another pass" signal and says a TRUNCATED result reads SUCCESS
TaskResult.from (:116) + JsonTaskResultCodec persists the name (:58); decodes an unknown name as COMPLETED/ERROR from the success flag (:102-112)
AgentStepResult.isComplete() == COMPLETED (:80-82)
DefaultWorkflowContext step cache saves only when isComplete() (:162-165)
StepOutcome / StepOutcomeCodec only COMPLETED outcomes are ever encoded (StepOutcome.java:25); decode is a strict valueOf that throws on an unknown name (StepOutcomeCodec.java:106-111)
WorkflowPatterns.loopUntilDry a round counts as quiet only if isComplete() (:201)
WorkflowPatterns.completenessCritic stops on !isSuccess() \|\| !isComplete() (:249, :257)
AgentResultView (aimon-workflow-graaljs) isComplete and completionReason.name() to scripts (:34-36)
SubagentBackedSkillForkExecutor isSuccess() only (:123-126)
DefaultSubagentExecutionManager.finalizeBackgroundTask FAILED iff !isSuccess() (:855-860); the notification detail is the summary or error message, head-cut to 500 chars (:965-995, :107)
TaskTool.formatSubagentResult getStatus() (:619) and getSummary() (:627-628)
AgentOutputTool.formatAgentResult TaskResult.getStatus() (:378); not this run's file

2.4 The Task tool's output has a parser in another module

TaskTool.formatSubagentResult (:613-630) writes === Subagent Task Result ===, Subagent:, Task:, Status:, Iterations:, Tokens:, a blank line, Result:, then the tail-kept summary. aimon-cli's SubagentResultDisplayHook (:33-36, a file owned by the sibling run anthropic-default-model-followups) parses it:

=== Subagent Task Result ===\s+Subagent: (.+)\s+Task: (.+)\s+Status: (\w+)\s+Iterations: (\d+)\s+Tokens: (\d+)\s+\s+Result:\s+([\s\S]+)

Only whitespace may sit between Status: and Result:. A line added anywhere in that span stops the match, and the CLI silently stops rendering subagent results. Nothing would go red: SubagentResultDisplayHookTest builds its own input string (:209-218) rather than calling TaskTool. Group 6 captures everything after Result:.

SubagentResultFormatter.truncateTailKeep keeps the tail (:53-76), so the marker at the end of a cut answer survives the Task tool's own elision.

2.5 ChunkAggregator's parse WARN — what Jackson puts in the message (measured)

parseArguments WARNs Failed to parse accumulated tool_call arguments as JSON: {} (json={}) with e.getMessage() and the whole string (:295). Dropping json= is not enough. Measured with the build's own Jackson (jackson-databind / jackson-core 2.22.2 from the Gradle cache, libs.versions.toml:109), ObjectMapper.readValue(json, Map) as at :292, run from a scratch directory, not billed:

Input Exception getMessage() carries argument text? Location
{"path": "/tmp/sea.txt" (the shape #113's live probe saw) JsonEOFException"Unexpected end-of-input: expected close marker for Object" no char offset 23 = length
{"path": "/tmp/x", "content": "SECRET-FILE-BODY-abc JsonEOFException"was expecting closing quote for a string value" no 51 = length
{"command": SECRETTOKENxyz} JsonParseException"Unrecognized token 'SECRETTOKENxyz': was expecting …" yes 12
["SECRET-in-array"] MismatchedInputException no 0
{ not valid json SECRET JsonParseException"Unexpected character ('n' (code 110))" no (one character) 2

Source content is REDACTED in the location (INCLUDE_SOURCE_IN_LOCATION is off by default), but the token excerpt in the message is not. For the common cut, the exception type plus an offset equal to the length already says "ended early".

2.6 The records items

  • CHANGELOG.md:59"No permission check and no PermissionRequest/PreTool/PostTool hook runs for a refused call"; the only statement of it in tests is a comment (OrcaAgentExecutorTruncationTest.java:283-285).
  • docs/design/agent-execution/orca-executor.md §2.2 (:98-117) presents TruncationRecoveryStrategy, FlaggingTruncationRecoveryStrategy as the default and an opt-in ContinuingTruncationRecoveryStrategy; git grep TruncationRecoveryStrategy matches docs only. Three sentences lean on it: the §2 premise that a cut response carries no tool_use (:68), §12's opt-in SPI list (:370), and §13's item 3 (:404). The file's header says IMPLEMENTED; docs/design/ has no .en.md twins.
  • AnthropicThinkingBudgetsTest.java:72"HIGH clamps out of the box"; the javadoc it repeats was narrowed by #101 to "whenever the call's LlmModel sets no maxTokens and AnthropicConfig.Builder.maxTokens(int) was not used" (AnthropicThinkingBudgets.java:123-125).

3. Decisions

Each decision states the option taken, the options rejected, and why; each becomes its own heading in the PR body.

D1 — The skill loop refuses every call of a cut response and marks a cut final answer in getResponse(); no typed field

Taken. LlmSkillExecutor reads each response once with TruncatedResponses.isTruncated, as both executors do.

  • A cut response with tool calls. The assistant message is committed as today (every tool_use must be answered). The dispatcher — bound or fallback — is not called; each call is answered with TruncatedResponses.refusal(toolUse), in order. One WARN names the skill, the 1-based iteration, the tool names (never their arguments) and TruncatedResponses.reasoningClause(response.getTokenUsage()). The loop continues, and D5's guard ends a streak.
  • A cut final answer. The text gets TruncatedResponses.TRUNCATION_MARKER appended, the flagged message is committed to the scratch transcript with its reasoning traces, and the result is SkillExecutionResult.success(flagged, metadata). One WARN names the skill and the reasoning clause.

How it shows in a skill's result. The marker is the suffix of getResponse(), which is what reaches CommandExecutionResult.getResponse(), the turn's final answer and the turn's transcript.

What a person sees of a refusal — less than on a turn. A single refusal leaves nothing in the result, and nothing on the terminal either. On a turn a refused call still emits ToolUseStarted and ToolResultReady, and the REPL prints Tool '<name>' failed: Cut off at max_tokens: … from the latter (CHANGELOG.md:65-68; OrcaAgentExecutorTruncationTest.aRefusedCallStillEmitsItsLifecycleEvents). The command path's bound dispatcher emits no lifecycle events, even for calls it does run (OrcaAgentExecutor.java:2079-2088), and the REPL's usual tool-call line comes from a PreTool hook that a refused call never reaches. So one refusal shows only in the WARN and in what the model reads next. A streak ends the skill through D5 with a failure whose message names max_tokens (D4), and that failure is the first thing a person running /skill sees. This is not a regression — the command path never emitted events — and it is not widened here (§8.1 F-7).

Rejected — a typed signal on the skill result (a CompletionReason, or isTruncated() on the result or its metadata). Nothing would read it. The only consumer copies four fields into CommandExecutionResult, which has no slot, and the turn is built from isSuccess() (§2.2); carrying the signal to the turn means public additions to CommandExecutionResult and changes in command/**, neither of which is this run's. The fork-mode skill path already delivers a cut fork as success plus marker text, so the marker is the shape a skill result has for a cut answer today. A field no reader reads is a second, unverified way of saying what the text already says.

Rejected — return a failure for a cut final answer. A failure's response is an error message, so the partial text the turn and the fork both keep would be lost on this path alone.

Consequence, recorded rather than changed: a turn that runs a slash skill whose final answer was cut ends COMPLETED, with the marker in its final answer (§8 F-2).

D2 — ReActLlmDeriver.derive changes with it: cut tool calls are refused, and nothing else

Taken. Each response is read once with isTruncated. A cut response with tool calls has every call answered with refusal without invokeTool, one WARN names the observer key, the iteration, the tool names and the reasoning clause, and the loop continues inside its existing six-iteration and token-budget bounds. A cut text-only response ends the loop as today: derive returns observations, never text, so a marker would have no reader. No stall guard: six iterations and the budget already bound it.

Reachability, measured by search: zero main-source mentions outside the class, in every module (§2.1).

Rejected — wait for a construction site (L-22's "ReActLlmDeriver 는 main 소스에서 처음 생성될 때"). That trigger never passes this place (docs/backlog/README.md rule seven): the day someone constructs the deriver is a change to some other file — aimon-cli's memory wiring, a starter — that touches neither this class nor L-22, so the item would not wake and the defect would ship with the construction, silently. The loop runs unattended (its class javadoc) and its one tool that matters writes to the observation store; whether a cut deriver.observation.create call arrives with no arguments or with some depends on the unmeasured blocking-path shape, and refusing does not. The change is a few lines in a final class, pinned with the existing stub harness. Rule six still governs how it is recorded: the L-22 closure says the fix was made on a class no deployment constructs, not that a deployment was exposed.

D3 — The fork gets the turn's guard, through one shared definition, and ends ERROR

Taken. A new at.aimon.core.agent.budget.StalledIterationGuard (§5.1) holds the threshold (3), the predicate (at least one result, all of them errors) and the per-execution streak. OrcaAgentExecutor uses it in place of its local counter — MAX_CONSECUTIVE_STALLED_ITERATIONS stays public with the same name and value, and the package-private isStalledIteration stays as a delegate (OrcaAgentExecutorStalledIterationTest calls it). DefaultSubagentExecutor records each tool iteration after its iteration-tail cancellation check (:484-486). On a trip the fork WARNs and returns createFailureResult(lc, guard.stopMessage(), iterationCount, accumulatedTokens, CompletionReason.ERROR), which fires OnStop with success=false and streams [ended: <message>] (:1011-1023).

It lives in agent.budget for the reason TruncatedResponses does — the fork may not reference agent.impl — beside BudgetTracker, the package's other mutable per-execution type.

Why after the tail check. The fork's tail check (isCancelledOrInterrupted) consumes the thread flag and returns INTERRUPTED. Placed after it, a cancelled iteration can never be counted — the property the turn gets by reading isCancelled() directly before counting (OrcaAgentExecutor.java:1818; docs/design/agent-execution/interrupt.md:315-318). A fork has no queue drain, so nothing else sits between.

Rejected — count only consecutive truncated responses. 1. It is a second definition of "no progress" beside the turn's, the drift TruncatedResponses exists to prevent; the fork's javadoc makes parity with the turn its design and names the missing guard as the one difference (:99-105). 2. It misses a streak the turn catches: a fork alternating cut responses and failing retries resets a truncation-only counter on every uncut iteration and never trips. 3. It leaves the fork's non-truncation death spiral — up to 1000 unbudgeted iterations, most often in a background task nobody watches — which is the case the turn's guard was built for (orca-executor.md §5).

The observable change, named in CHANGELOG.md and the PR body. A fork whose every tool call fails for three consecutive iterations — whatever the cause: a tool error, an unknown tool name, a schema ENFORCE rejection, a PermissionRequest or PreTool block, or the side-effect approval gate denying because a fork has no channel to ask — now ends ERROR with the stop message, where it used to continue to its maxIterations. One successful call resets the streak.

CompletionReason: reuse ERROR. Every reader in §2.3, read against it:

Reader A stall ending ERROR A new STALLED constant instead
SubagentExecutionResult isSuccess() false, getStatus() FAILURE, summary = stop message same, plus a name
TaskResult + JsonTaskResultCodec persists "ERROR", which every node version decodes persists "STALLED"; an older node decodes it as ERROR, so one record means two things across a rolling upgrade
AgentStepResult.isComplete() false false
Workflow step cache not cached; a resume re-runs the step same
StepOutcome / codec never encoded (COMPLETED only) never encoded — and its strict decode would throw if a future path let one through
loopUntilDry not a quiet round; the empty-streak resets same
completenessCritic stops and keeps the previous draft same
GraalJS AgentResultView isComplete: false, completionReason: "ERROR" script authors meet a new string
SubagentBackedSkillForkExecutor Skill fork failed for '<skill>': <stop message> same
Background task FAILED; notification detail = stop message (~170 chars, under the 500 cap) same
Task tool (D6) Status: FAILURE, Completion reason: ERROR STALLED

No reader branches differently between a stall and any other error, so every one reads ERROR correctly. The one reader that needs to tell a max_tokens stall from a failing-tool stall is the parent model reading the summary, and it is served in text (D4). By the task's own rule — reuse unless a reader cannot tell the cases apart — ERROR stands.

  • Rejected STALLED: a public, persisted enum name that no reader would branch on, a new string for scripts, and a rolling-upgrade hazard wherever a strict decoder meets it.
  • Rejected TRUNCATED for a stall made only of refusals: #113 decided ERROR for the same stall on a turn (max-tokens-truncation-reporting.md §11.3 Q1), and TRUNCATED on a fork promises a success with the partial answer in getSummary() (SubagentExecutionResult.java:349-352). A stall has no final answer, so it would be a failure under a success reason.
  • Rejected MAX_ITERATIONS: that reason is the "needs another pass" signal (:345-346); a stalled fork re-run with the same goal stalls again.
  • Rejected ABORTED: framework-initiated cancellation.

D4 — The stop message names max_tokens when every stalled iteration in the streak was a refused cut response

Taken. StalledIterationGuard.stopMessage() returns today's text byte for byte — Execution aborted: N consecutive tool-only iterations made no progress (all tool calls failed) (OrcaAgentExecutor.java:2582-2583) — and, when every iteration of the streak was a cut response whose calls were refused, appends — each of those responses was cut off at max_tokens, and its tool calls were refused. The turn, the fork and the skill loop all use it. A mixed streak gets the plain text. The guards' WARNs stay free of the words max_tokens, so #113's assertion that exactly one WARN per cut response names it (OrcaAgentExecutorTruncationTest.java:237-240) keeps holding.

Why. D3 reuses ERROR because no programmatic reader branches on the difference. The parent model does: a failing tool invites another tool, a cut response invites less output per response — and all it reads is Status: FAILURE, Completion reason: ERROR and this message. Without the clause it cannot tell, and will likely resend the same task. The turn's refused-only stall is #113's and still under [Unreleased], so no released message changes; every other stall message is unchanged.

Rejected — the clause on the fork only: two texts for one condition. Rejected — no clause: the reader that acts on the difference cannot see it.

D5 — The skill loop gets the same guard now

Taken. LlmSkillExecutor records each tool iteration after its results are committed and before the next sendMessage. On a trip it WARNs (skill name, streak, tool iterations, tokens — no max_tokens) and returns SkillExecutionResult.failure(guard.stopMessage(), new IllegalStateException(message), metadata), with the metadata's iteration count set to the tool iterations completed (the loop's iterationCount + 1 at that point).

Why now. D1 creates, in the skill loop, the refusal repeat L-23 describes for the fork — bounded by max-iterations (100 by default) and no budget, on the one loop a person is sitting in front of and cannot interrupt (§2.1). With D3's shared guard it costs a few lines. Leaving it registered would keep L-23's defect on exactly that loop.

Rejected — keep it registered: above. Rejected — a truncation-only counter here: D3's reasons.

The observable change. A slash skill whose tool calls all fail for three consecutive iterations now fails with the stop message instead of continuing to its max-iterations. The causes are the same breadth as a fork's: - a tool error or an unknown tool; - an allow-list refusal on the dispatcher path; - a PermissionRequest or PreTool block; - the side-effect approval gate denying a call — the bound dispatcher runs SingleToolInvoker, which consults the gate whenever one is wired (SingleToolInvoker.java:192-200), so a user who declines a mutating call three iterations running ends the skill.

A permission violation on the fallback path still throws and fails the skill at once (LlmSkillExecutor.java:229-231), as today.

D6 — The Task tool prints Completion reason: <NAME> after the Result block when the reason is not COMPLETED; getStatus() is unchanged

Taken. formatSubagentResult appends, after the tail-kept summary, a line Completion reason: <NAME> whenever !result.getCompletionReason().isSuccessful(). When the result is also isSuccess() — today that is exactly TRUNCATED — the line continues (the subagent's final answer is incomplete). Everything from the header through Result: is byte-identical. Examples in §5.3.

  • After Result:, because SubagentResultDisplayHook accepts nothing but whitespace between Status: and Result: (§2.4). Group 6 captures the new line, so the CLI shows it at the end of the rendered result.
  • Only when not COMPLETED, because after Result: an always-present line would add to every CLI-rendered subagent result, and the line carries information exactly when the finish was not clean. For failures it adds the reason (ERROR, MAX_ITERATIONS, INTERRUPTED, a budget name) — the plain reading of "print the completion reason", and a rule that needs no revisiting when a reason is added.
  • isSuccessful() rather than naming TRUNCATED, because it is the predicate CompletionReason documents for this distinction, TaskTool then encodes no constant, and it needs no new import — so TaskTool.java:553 (.defaultModel(), which a sibling run's record cites, does not move.

Rejected — change what the status says for a cut result (getStatus() returning, say, TRUNCATED). It is a public method whose javadoc promises two values (:325-335), TaskResult.getStatus() promises to match it (:140-144), and AgentOutputTool and the CLI hook read the word. The smaller change reaches the parent model, so the larger one has no reason. Rejected — Status: SUCCESS (TRUNCATED): breaks the CLI regex.

D7 — ChunkAggregator's WARN names the failure and the size, never the text

Taken. Failed to parse accumulated tool_call arguments as JSON: <ExceptionSimpleName>[ at offset N] (<length> chars); the arguments are not logged. The offset clause is written only when the exception is a JsonProcessingException, has a location, and getLocation().getCharOffset() is not negative — JsonLocation reports -1 for an unknown offset, and at offset -1 would read as a fact. Otherwise the clause is omitted. The returned empty map is unchanged.

Why not keep e.getMessage(): Jackson copies the offending token into it (§2.5). Rejected — a length-bounded excerpt of the arguments: still content — a command line, a file body.

D8 — #113's hook claim is pinned by tests on the turn, the fork and the skill loop; CHANGELOG.md:59 stays as written

Taken. Each test registers counting PermissionRequest, PreTool and PostTool hooks and a counting tool, sends a cut response calling the tool, then — the positive control — an uncut response with the same call. After the cut iteration every counter and the tool read 0; after the uncut one they read 1. The control is what makes 0 mean "not reached" rather than "not wired". The skill loop's test goes through the bound dispatcher (SlashSkillToolDispatchE2EIntegrationTest), the only path on which a skill's call can reach a hook.

Rejected — rewrite the sentence as "by construction": the task prefers the test, and "by construction" is what a later refactor of a refusal path silently stops being.

D9 — orca-executor.md: rewrite §2.2 to what shipped, with the three sentences that lean on it

Taken. docs/design/README.md §3.1 lets the Status line carry implementation state, and §3.2 keeps revision notes out of a design body ("정정은 본문에 반영하고 흔적은 지운다"). orca-executor.md is a living design document, not a record committed from an approved review, so the body is corrected, not annotated:

  • :68 — the §2 premise becomes conditional: a cut response with no tool_use took the !hasToolUses() branch.
  • §2.2 (:98-117) — new heading and body, sketched in §4.3. One definition, TruncatedResponses, is read by four loops: the turn, the fork and a skill's loop answer both shapes and stop a streak of refusals through the stall guard (§5); ReActLlmDeriver only refuses cut calls — it returns no text to mark, and six iterations and its token budget bound it. No strategy interface and no continuation were built; the reason continuation was not the default (merge and signature blocks) stays, and the reasons for refusing link to max-tokens-truncation-reporting.md and this design's record.
  • §5 (:150-162) — the guard is StalledIterationGuard, shared by the turn, the fork and a skill's loop, and a streak of refusals names max_tokens in its stop message.
  • §12 (:370) — TruncationRecoveryStrategy leaves the opt-in SPI list.
  • §13 item 3 (:404) — continuation is not built and has no seam; building it would replace the refusal and the marker.

Rejected — mark §2.2 "not built" and keep its text: §3.2 keeps dead design out of the body, and the document's status is IMPLEMENTED; a reader should find what exists. No inbound link targets §2.2 with a fragment (checked), and check-doc-links.py confirms after the heading changes.

D10 — Records: a new changelog entry that supersedes, two closures, one registration, and this design as a record

  • CHANGELOG.md. A new [Unreleased] entry at the top (§4.3). It says it supersedes two sentences of #113's entry below and quotes them (:81, :83-85); #113's entry stays byte-identical. Precedent: #104's entry supersedes three sentences of #92's rather than rewriting it. The additive public type StalledIterationGuard is named, and so is the design record. No renames, so docs/migration/rename-maps.md is untouched.
  • Backlog. L-22 and L-23 get ### 닫힘 (2026-09-11, #115 · #117) blocks that say, per rules two, three and five, what held and what did not, each linking the record (§4.3); L-25 is registered (§8 F-1); the register title and the docs/backlog/README.md index row are recounted from the body.
  • This design is committed as a record at docs/design/agent-execution/skill-loop-truncation-and-fork-stall.md, beside max-tokens-truncation-reporting.md, whose decisions it extends to the next loops; the code it decides is the loops, which is why #113's record sits in agent-execution/ too. It follows the practice on main (babfc1a, 784ae2f, 5606b04) and the task's amended section on #122:
  • a Status header written at commit time above the body (§4.3);
  • the body as approved in the final design review round, byte-exact, including its test strategy and file:line citations — which #122 decided a committed record keeps;
  • a closing section, ## 11. After the build — departures, corrections, and what went to the backlog, appended after the build;
  • one row in the agent-execution table of docs/design/README.md §2, after max-tokens-truncation-reporting.md's (:43). §3 of that file is not touched — the design-record-exemption run owns it. docs/design/ is not a translation target and its README has no twin; mkdocs.yml has no explicit nav to extend.

Rejected — no record. Revision 1's only reason, that this batch must not edit docs/design/README.md, was withdrawn by the task's amendment at 04:38Z, and nothing else holds. The PR body is not in the repository. docs/design/README.md opens by saying decisions, their reasons and the alternatives rejected live in that directory, and these ten include one that overturns a registered trigger (D2 against L-22) and one that settles how a persisted enum is read by eleven readers (D3). The L-22 and L-23 closures, the changelog entry and orca-executor.md §2.2 each need a document to point at, as #113's did.


4. Concrete changes, by module and file

4.1 aimon-core — main

File Change
agent/budget/StalledIterationGuard.java New — §5.1
agent/budget/TruncatedResponses.java Javadoc only. "One definition for both ReAct loops" becomes the four loops (turn, fork, LlmSkillExecutor, ReActLlmDeriver). The final-answer bullet says it ends TRUNCATED on the two executors, carries the marker in a skill's result, and is discarded by the deriver; the tool-call bullet names StalledIterationGuard as what ends a streak on the turn, the fork and the skill loop
agent/budget/package-info.java A bullet for StalledIterationGuard; the TruncatedResponses bullet stops saying "both ReAct loops"
agent/budget/CompletionReason.java ERROR's javadoc adds that an execution stopped by StalledIterationGuard ends with it. No new constant
agent/impl/orca/OrcaAgentExecutor.java MAX_CONSECUTIVE_STALLED_ITERATIONS = the guard's constant (javadoc says it is kept for callers reading it here, like TRUNCATION_MARKER). The local counter (:1559-1561) becomes a StalledIterationGuard. :1818-1828 becomes: if cancellationSignal.isCancelled() reset, else if guard.recordToolIteration(toolUseResults, truncated) emit IterationCompleted and return handleStalledIteration(scope, iterationCount, accumulatedTokens, guard). isStalledIteration (:2554) delegates to StalledIterationGuard.isStalled. handleStalledIteration (:2580) takes the guard, uses guard.stopMessage(), and keeps its WARN wording
subagent/execution/DefaultSubagentExecutor.java A guard beside iterationCount in runReActLoop; after the tail check at :484-486, if (guard.recordToolIteration(toolUseResults, truncated)) return createStalledResult(...). New private createStalledResult: WARN Subagent '{}' stalled-iteration guard tripped: consecutiveStalledIterations={}, iterations={}, tokens={}, then createFailureResult(..., guard.stopMessage(), ..., ERROR). Javadoc: class (:99-105) says the fork shares the turn's guard and drops "one difference remains"; runReActLoop (:368-369) adds the guard to its stop list; refuseTruncatedToolUses (:824-826) replaces "a fork has no stalled-iteration guard"
skill/execution/llm/LlmSkillExecutor.java A private static final Logger log. In the loop, after the max-iterations check and the assistant commit: truncated ? refuseTruncatedToolUses(skill, response, iterationCount) : toolDispatcher.dispatch(...); commit the results; if (guard.recordToolIteration(results, truncated)) return the stall failure; then the next call. After the loop: if the last response is cut, flag, WARN, commit with traces, return success(flagged, metadata). Class javadoc: a paragraph on max_tokens and the guard, and the stall in the flow list
memory/deriver/ReActLlmDeriver.java In derive, after the no-tool-calls break (:206): if isTruncated(response), WARN and answer each call with refusal; otherwise the invokeTool loop (:215-218). Class javadoc: one paragraph
tools/task/TaskTool.java formatSubagentResult (:613-630) appends the D6 line after the summary; its javadoc gives the placement reason (the CLI parser). No import, nothing above :613 changes
llm/streaming/ChunkAggregator.java parseArguments' catch (:294-296) logs per D7; imports com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonProcessingException

SubagentExecutionResult.java, CompletionReason's values, TaskResult, both codecs, AgentStepResult, StepOutcome and every workflow class: no change (D3's table).

4.2 aimon-llm-anthropic — test comment

AnthropicThinkingBudgetsTest.budgetIsClampedBelowMaxTokens (:72): "The default maxTokens of 4096 makes this the common case rather than an edge: HIGH clamps whenever the call's LlmModel sets no maxTokens — an agent definition with no model.maxTokens — and AnthropicConfig.Builder.maxTokens(int) was not used." Split to stay within the formatter's width.

4.3 Docs

docs/design/agent-execution/orca-executor.md (Korean canonical, no twin) — D9. Proposed §2.2:

### 2.2 한 정의, 두 모양 — 전략 인터페이스는 만들지 않았다

판정은 StopReason.isTruncated() 하나이고, 그것을 읽는 곳은 at.aimon.core.agent.budget.TruncatedResponses 하나다. 도구 호출이 없는 잘린 최종 답은 부분 텍스트에 [System: response truncated at max_tokens] 를 붙여 노출한다 — 두 실행기에서는 CompletionReason.TRUNCATED 로 끝나고(isSuccess() == true, isSuccessful() == false), 스킬 루프(LlmSkillExecutor)는 같은 마커를 스킬 결과의 텍스트 끝에 붙인다. 도구 호출이 있는 잘린 응답은 어느 호출도 실행하지 않고 호출마다 max_tokens 를 말하는 오류 결과로 답한 뒤 루프를 잇는다 — 응답은 어느 호출이 잘렸는지 말하지 않기 때문이다. 턴·포크·스킬 루프에서는 그런 응답이 이어지면 §5 의 정체 가드가 끝낸다. ReActLlmDeriver 는 잘린 도구 호출을 거절하는 것만 같다 — 텍스트를 돌려주지 않으므로 표시할 답이 없고, 반복은 여섯 iteration 과 토큰 예산이 끝낸다. TruncationRecoveryStrategy 같은 전략 인터페이스와 이어쓰기 (continuation)는 만들지 않았다. 이어쓰기를 기본으로 두지 않은 이유(병합과 서명 블록)는 그대로이고, 호출을 거절하는 이유는 max-tokens-truncation-reporting.md 에, 그 판정이 스킬 루프와 포크의 정체 가드에 닿은 결정은 skill-loop-truncation-and-fork-stall.md 에 있다.

CHANGELOG.md — a new entry at the top of [Unreleased], titled along the lines of "Agent loop: a skill's loop refuses a cut tool call too, a fork stops after three stalled iterations, and the Task tool says when a fork's answer was cut", with one bullet per behaviour change:

  • the skill loop's refusal, marker and WARN (the client's own WARN still fires), and that a single refused skill call shows on no terminal — #115;
  • the skill loop's stall guard, as the D5 observable change, naming the side-effect approval gate among its causes — #115;
  • the fork's stall guard, as the D3 observable change: ERROR, and what reads it (task records, isComplete(), the step cache, loopUntilDry, completenessCritic, GraalJS, a fork-mode skill, the Task tool) — #115;
  • the stop message's max_tokens clause on the turn, the fork and the skill loop, with the plain text unchanged — #115;
  • ReActLlmDeriver refuses cut calls, and no in-tree code constructs it — #115;
  • the Task tool's Completion reason: line: after the result, only when not COMPLETED, header unchanged, the CLI shows it at the end of the rendered result, getStatus() unchanged — #117;
  • the parse WARN no longer logs arguments — #117;
  • the entry below's "No permission check and no PermissionRequest/PreTool/PostTool hook runs for a refused call" is now pinned by tests on the turn, the fork and the skill loop — #117;
  • new public at.aimon.core.agent.budget.StalledIterationGuard; OrcaAgentExecutor.MAX_CONSECUTIVE_STALLED_ITERATIONS keeps its name and value;
  • records: orca-executor.md §2.2, the test comment, L-22 and L-23 closed, L-25 registered; the design is docs/design/agent-execution/skill-loop-truncation-and-fork-stall.md;
  • supersedes two sentences of #113's entry: "TaskTool still prints Status: SUCCESS; …" and "A fork has no stalled-iteration guard, so a fork whose every response is cut repeats the refusal until its maxIterations stops it …".

docs/backlog/llm-config-surface-open-items.md — owned only for L-22, L-23 and the reserved L-25, L-26:

  • L-22 닫힘, linking the record.
  • 무엇을 is met (D1).
  • The three 정할 것: the stall guard (D5), how the marker shows (D1), and the deriver (D2 — changed, with the rule-seven reason and rule six's wording).
  • Rule five: the prescription was applied after failing tests (§7.0).
  • Rule three: say whether the blocking-path shape was measured (§7.12), and that the loop cannot be interrupted, which made the item heavier than it said.
  • 남은 것: a single refused skill call shows on no terminal, because the command path emits no lifecycle events for any skill call (§8.1 F-7).
  • L-23 닫힘, linking the record. The first prescription was taken (D3), and the closure says why the second was not; ERROR, with the readers checked; the observable change beyond truncation. Rule three: unmeasured whether a model keeps issuing cut calls after a refusal (§9 Q2).
  • L-25 등록 — §8 F-1, placed here as L-23's pair, the reason L-16, L-22 and L-23 are in this register.
  • Title recounted from the body. On this branch alone: 25 items, 13 open, 12 closed.

docs/backlog/README.md — the llm-config-surface-open-items.md index row (:360), recounted from the body (25 | 13 | 12 | 0 on this branch alone). The sibling anthropic-default-model-followups changes the same counts; merge recounts.

docs/design/agent-execution/skill-loop-truncation-and-fork-stall.md — new, D10. Its first lines are a Status header in the shape of max-tokens-truncation-reporting.md's, written at commit time:

  • Status: IMPLEMENTED and what it covers — the new StalledIterationGuard; the cut-response and stall paths of LlmSkillExecutor, DefaultSubagentExecutor, OrcaAgentExecutor and ReActLlmDeriver; the Task tool's result; ChunkAggregator's WARN; one test comment in aimon-llm-anthropic; orca-executor.md §2.2; backlog L-22 and L-23 (closed) and L-25. Sources: #115 and #117.
  • A pointer to §11 as where the build departed, and a statement that everything between the header and §11 is the body as approved in the final design review round, byte-exact, its file:line citations at main c561e17.
  • A note that the review transcripts and run records the body names (review-*.md, TASK.md, $RUN_DIR/build/) are not in the repository, and that §11 reproduces what was measured.
  • A line saying it is in English, like its siblings, and that docs/design/ is not a translation target.

Then this document's body, unedited. After the build, ## 11. After the build — departures, corrections, and what went to the backlog is appended — departures, places the body is wrong, and the measurements (§7.0's pre-fix run, §7.11's counts, §7.12 if run).

docs/design/README.md — one row in §2's agent-execution table, after max-tokens-truncation-reporting.md's (:43), in Korean like its neighbours:

| [`skill-loop-truncation-and-fork-stall.md`](agent-execution/skill-loop-truncation-and-fork-stall.md) | 그 판정이 스킬 루프와 `ReActLlmDeriver` 에 닿는 자리 — 포크와 스킬 루프가 턴의 정체 가드를 함께 쓰는 이유, 멈춘 포크를 새 값이 아닌 `ERROR` 로 두고 열한 독자가 그것을 읽는 방식, `Task` 도구가 잘린 포크를 말하는 줄 |

No other part of that file changes; §3 belongs to design-record-exemption.


5. Data and interface shapes

5.1 The new type

package at.aimon.core.agent.budget;

/**
 * The death-spiral guard every tool loop with one shares: a turn, a subagent fork and a skill's loop. Not thread-safe;
 * one instance per execution, like BudgetTracker.
 */
public final class StalledIterationGuard {

    /** Consecutive stalled iterations tolerated before the loop stops. */
    public static final int MAX_CONSECUTIVE_STALLED_ITERATIONS = 3;

    /** An iteration is stalled when it issued at least one tool call and every result is an error. */
    public static boolean isStalled(List<ToolUseResult> toolUseResults) { ... }

    /**
     * Records one completed tool iteration. A non-stalled iteration resets the streak.
     *
     * @param refusedAtMaxTokens whether this iteration's calls were refused because the response was cut at max_tokens
     * @return true iff this iteration brings the streak to the threshold
     */
    public boolean recordToolIteration(List<ToolUseResult> toolUseResults, boolean refusedAtMaxTokens) { ... }

    public void reset() { ... }

    public int getConsecutiveStalledIterations() { ... }

    /** The failure message of an execution this guard stopped (D4). Meaningful after recordToolIteration returned true. */
    public String stopMessage() { ... }
}

State: an int streak and a boolean "every iteration in the streak was refused", both cleared by a non-stalled iteration and by reset(). Names follow BudgetTracker's record* vocabulary; the build may adjust a name, not the shape.

5.2 Text that changes

Stop message (turn, fork, skill):

Execution aborted: 3 consecutive tool-only iterations made no progress (all tool calls failed)
Execution aborted: 3 consecutive tool-only iterations made no progress (all tool calls failed) — each of those responses was cut off at max_tokens, and its tool calls were refused

The first line is today's text, pinned byte for byte (§7.3); the second is used only when every stalled iteration was a refusal.

New WARNs:

Where Text
Skill, cut tool calls Skill '{}' response truncated at max_tokens in iteration {} with tool calls {}: none of them is run; each is answered with an error result{}
Skill, cut final answer Skill '{}' final answer truncated at max_tokens after {} tool iterations; returning flagged partial answer{}
Skill, guard Skill '{}' stalled-iteration guard tripped: consecutiveStalledIterations={}, iterations={}, tokens={}
Fork, guard Subagent '{}' stalled-iteration guard tripped: consecutiveStalledIterations={}, iterations={}, tokens={}
Deriver, cut tool calls ReActLlmDeriver response truncated at max_tokens in iteration {} for {} with tool calls {}: none of them is run; each is answered with an error result{}
ChunkAggregator Failed to parse accumulated tool_call arguments as JSON: {}{} ({} chars); the arguments are not logged

The trailing {} on the truncation WARNs is TruncatedResponses.reasoningClause. In ChunkAggregator's, the second {} is at offset N, left empty when there is no location or N is negative (D7).

5.3 The Task tool's output

A cut fork:

=== Subagent Task Result ===
Subagent: explorer
Task: map the module
Status: SUCCESS
Iterations: 4
Tokens: 51234

Result:
The module has three packages: api, impl, and

[System: response truncated at max_tokens]
Completion reason: TRUNCATED (the subagent's final answer is incomplete)

A fork stopped by the guard ends with Status: FAILURE, the stop message as the result, then Completion reason: ERROR. A COMPLETED result is byte-identical to today.

5.4 What does not change

CompletionReason's values; SubagentExecutionResult, SkillExecutionResult, SkillExecutionMetadata, TaskResult, StepOutcome and their codecs; every persisted or wire name; getStatus() on both result types; OrcaAgentExecutor.MAX_CONSECUTIVE_STALLED_ITERATIONS' name and value; the refusal text; the marker text; the executors' existing truncation WARNs.


6. Failure modes

# Situation What happens
F1 Blocking path: a cut tool_use arrives as a tool call with {} or partial input Skill and deriver refuse it (D1, D2) — the design holds
F2 Blocking path: the cut block is dropped, leaving text plus MAX_TOKENS The skill marks a cut final answer — the design holds
F3 Blocking path: the SDK throws converting a malformed block LlmClientException: the skill fails with its existing message and the deriver breaks, as today — no regression
F4 A provider reports a cut as UNKNOWN Not detected, as TruncatedResponses documents
F5 Three refused responses in a row Turn and fork end ERROR, the skill fails; the message names max_tokens; exactly three LLM calls
F6 A mixed streak (refusal, failing tool, refusal) Trips at three with the plain message
F7 A successful call before the threshold The streak resets and nothing trips (tested on fork and skill)
F8 Cancellation lands on a would-be third stalled iteration Turn INTERRUPTED (existing test); fork INTERRUPTED — the guard sits after the tail check (tested); the skill loop has no cancellation
F9 maxIterations below 3 MAX_ITERATIONS (fork) or the max-iterations failure (skill) comes first, as today
F10 A budget exhausted mid-streak The fork's budget check at the top of the next iteration stops it with the budget's reason
F11 Fallback-path permission violation in a skill Thrown, immediate Permission denied failure — never counted
F12 A workflow resumes a run with a stalled step Not cached, so re-run; it may stall again, like any ERROR step
F13 A background fork stalls Task FAILED; the notification carries the stop message within its 500-character cap
F14 A fork's approval gate denies the same side-effect call three iterations running Now ERROR — the named D3 change
F15 A user declines a slash skill's mutating call three iterations running The skill fails with the stop message — the named D5 change
F16 A single refused call in a slash skill Nothing on the terminal; the WARN only (D1, F-7)
F17 Task tool, COMPLETED result Byte-identical; the CLI parser still matches
F18 Task tool, non-COMPLETED result One trailing line, which the CLI shows at the end of the rendered result
F19 Parse failure with a non-Jackson exception, or a Jackson location with offset -1 Class name and length, no offset clause
F20 Deriver under a persistent cut Each refusal spends an iteration and tokens; the loop ends at six or at the budget; nothing is persisted from a cut response
F21 Turn with streaming overlap on Refusal and eager-discard behaviour unchanged; the refused iteration counts, as now

7. Test strategy

Every new behaviour is pinned with a stubbed LlmClient or chunk stream, as #113's tests are.

7.0 Order (backlog rule five), and the existing tests the wider guards could flip

  1. Add StalledIterationGuard and its unit test, with no loop wired to it (as #113 added TruncatedResponses first).
  2. Write §7.2–§7.10 and run them against the unchanged loops. Record in build/measurements.md which fail and on what value. Expected to fail: the skill's cut call runs, and its cut answer has no marker and no WARN; the skill's and the fork's stall tests do not trip; the refused-only stall message has no clause; the deriver runs a cut call; the Task tool has no Completion reason: line; the parse WARN contains SECRETTOKENxyz; the skill's hook-count test sees one PreTool call on the cut response. Expected to pass before the fix: the turn's and the fork's hook-count tests (they pin a property that already holds) and the plain-message byte test.
  3. Implement, then re-run the same classes to green.

Existing tests the wider guards could flip. D3 and D5 stop any fork or skill whose tool calls all fail for three consecutive iterations, not only cut ones. A test that scripts such a streak and expects the loop to carry on would flip. Checked by reading — this design read the first two, and the review read all five — none does:

  • LlmSkillExecutorTest.shouldFailWhenMaxIterationsExceeded — two failing iterations, and max-iterations (2) stops it first;
  • SlashSkillToolDispatchE2EIntegrationTest's three cases — one tool iteration each;
  • DefaultSubagentExecutorSkillApprovalTest and DefaultSubagentExecutorSideEffectFilterTest — one call, then done;
  • OrcaAgentExecutorStalledIterationTest and OrcaAgentExecutorTerminalSessionStateTest — the turn's guard, whose threshold, predicate and cancellation rule D3 keeps.

Reading is not the gate. Before the build claims nothing else changed, the full aimon-core and aimon-workflow-graaljs suites run — both inside checkAll (§7.11) — with their counts reported per module. A test that flips because it encoded a loop carrying on past three all-error iterations is reported in build/deviations.md as an instance of the named observable change, not quietly rewritten.

7.1 agent/budget/StalledIterationGuardTest (new)

  • isStalled: empty → false; all errors → true; one success → false.
  • Two stalled then one success resets; three stalled trips on the third (the return is false, false, true).
  • The plain message equals today's literal byte for byte, with the count.
  • Three refused → the clause; refused, plain, refused → no clause; after a reset, the refused flag starts fresh.

7.2 OrcaAgentExecutorTruncationTest (existing class)

  • Hook-count test (D8): counting PermissionRequest, PreTool and PostTool hooks on the runtime's registry (a createContext overload that takes a hook registry), a cut call then an uncut call to CountingTool. After: tool = 1, PreTool = 1, PostTool = 1, PermissionRequest = 1, and the first iteration's tool_result is the refusal.
  • threeCutToolResponsesInARowTripTheStalledIterationGuard gains an assertion that the error message ends with the max_tokens clause.

7.3 OrcaAgentExecutorStalledIterationTest (existing)

threeConsecutiveFailingIterationsTripTheGuard gains an exact-equality assertion on the plain message, pinning that D4 changed nothing but the refused-only case.

7.4 DefaultSubagentExecutorTruncationTest (existing)

  • Hook-count test (D8) — the fork fixture's execute gains an overload that takes a hook registry.
  • Three cut tool responses → ERROR: exactly three LLM calls, tool invocations 0, the message's clause, three WARNs naming max_tokens with the guard's own WARN not among them, and [ended: …] in the stream.

7.5 DefaultSubagentExecutorStalledIterationTest (new; mirrors the turn's)

  • Three all-error iterations with a failing tool → ERROR, isSuccess() false, plain message, iteration count 3, three LLM calls; OnStop fired with success=false.
  • Recovers before the threshold: fail, fail, succeed, final answer → COMPLETED.
  • A parent cancellation signal tripped by the tool on the third failing iteration → INTERRUPTED, not ERROR (F8).
  • maxIterations(2) with failing tools → MAX_ITERATIONS (F9).

7.6 skill/execution/llm/LlmSkillExecutorTruncationTest (new)

Fixtures follow LlmSkillExecutorTest (queue-backed stub client, CountingTool, a recording SkillToolDispatcher):

  • Fallback path: a cut response calling CountingTool, then an answer → tool 0; the second call's last message holds the refusal; WARN names the skill, iteration 1, the tool name; success.
  • Dispatcher path: the bound dispatcher is never called for the cut response and is called once for an uncut one.
  • Cut final answer: isSuccess(), the response ends with the marker, WARN names the skill.
  • Uncut, or no stop reason: no marker, no WARN.
  • Three cut tool responses: failure, clause in the message, metadata iteration count 3, three LLM calls, tool 0.
  • Recovers before the threshold: a failing tool twice, then a success, then an answer → success.
  • Reasoning clause: present on both WARNs when the cut response reports reasoning tokens, absent otherwise.

7.7 SlashSkillToolDispatchE2EIntegrationTest (existing)

A slash skill whose first scripted response is a cut call to CountingTool, then an uncut call, then text. PreTool = 1, PostTool = 1, PermissionRequest = 1, executions = 1 (D8 on the skill loop).

7.8 ReActLlmDeriverTest (existing)

  • A cut response calling deriver.observation.create with complete-looking input, then text → nothing in the store, the refusal in the next conversation, a WARN naming max_tokens, created empty.
  • A cut text-only response → the loop ends with an empty result, as today.

7.9 TaskToolTest (existing)

  • A TRUNCATED success result → output contains Completion reason: TRUNCATED (the subagent's final answer is incomplete) after Result:, and contains the contiguous header Status: SUCCESS\nIterations: N\nTokens: N\n\nResult: — the comment names SubagentResultDisplayHook as the reader that needs it.
  • A COMPLETED result → no Completion reason:, header unchanged.
  • An ERROR failure → Completion reason: ERROR with no gloss.

7.10 ChunkAggregatorTest (existing)

A ListAppender on ChunkAggregator's logger. {"command": SECRETTOKENxyz} → the WARN contains JsonParseException and 27 chars and does not contain SECRETTOKENxyz (this input fails against a fix that only drops json=). {"path": "/tmp/sea.txt"JsonEOFException, at offset 23, 23 chars.

7.11 Gates

./gradlew format, then ./gradlew checkAll — report tests run, failed and skipped from the build output, per module that ran, aimon-core and aimon-workflow-graaljs included. The four doc checks — check-doc-links.py, check-backlog-registers.py, check-translation-staleness.py, check-translation-structure.py — run with the record and its index row in the tree.

7.12 Optional live probe

One non-streaming Anthropic request in #113's shape — claude-haiku-4-5, a forced write_file tool, max_tokens: 60, "stream": false — with the key passed through a process-substitution header, never exported. Record the request shape, status, request id and billing in build/measurements.md, and what content[] holds for the cut block. No decision depends on it: F1–F3 show the design holds for each possible shape. Its value is the L-22 closure's rule-three sentence. Skip it, and write "unmeasured", if reading the key is refused.


8. Findings outside the issues, and merge notes

8.1 Findings (for build/deviations.md and the PR body)

# Finding Disposition
F-1 The background half of #117 item 1. AgentOutputTool.formatAgentResult prints TaskResult.getStatus()SUCCESS for a TRUNCATED task — and not the reason TaskResult already stores (AgentOutputTool.java:378). The completion notification labels it COMPLETED and head-cuts the summary to 500 characters (DefaultSubagentExecutionManager.java:965-995), cutting the marker off a long answer; AgentOutput itself tail-keeps, so the marker survives there Register L-25. Same defect as #117 item 1, on the path a background fork takes; neither file is this run's
F-2 A turn that runs a slash skill whose final answer was cut ends COMPLETED, with the marker in the text (D1) Deviation and PR body; not registered — carrying a reason needs command/** and CommandExecutionResult, and no turn-level reader in tree branches on TRUNCATED (the CLI's OutputFormatter checks only INTERRUPTED)
F-3 thinking-reporting-and-dialect-records.md:1480 ("a fork has no guard and repeats until its maxIterations (L-23)") becomes false, and :1517 and :1616-1617 speak of L-22 and L-23 as open PR body — no run in this batch owns that record
F-4 The CLI's SubagentResultDisplayHook parses TaskTool's text, and its test never feeds it real TaskTool output; its status word stays SUCCESS for a cut fork PR body — the core side is pinned by §7.9
F-5 A slash command, and so a skill's loop, cannot be interrupted Deviation — pre-existing; D5 bounds the refusal case
F-6 max-tokens-truncation-reporting.md §8 and §11.3 describe the Task tool line and L-22/L-23 as open None — an approved record, historically true
F-7 A refused call in a skill's loop shows on no terminal: the command path's dispatcher emits no ToolUseStarted/ToolResultReady for any skill call (OrcaAgentExecutor.java:2079-2088), and the REPL's tool-call line is a PreTool hook. Only the WARN, and after a streak the stop message, reach a person Deviation, the L-22 closure's 남은 것 and the changelog; not registered — the command path has no event channel for a skill's calls, refused or run, so it is not a truncation gap

8.2 Merge notes (PR body)

  • orca-executor.md:325, cited by docs/design/llm/reasoning-delta-stream.md:842, moves with the §2.2 rewrite.
  • TaskTool.java:553 (.defaultModel(), cited by anthropic-default-model-followups' L-20 correction, must not move: D6 adds no import and edits only below :613. The build confirms with git diff -U0 on the file.
  • Dated line citations into OrcaAgentExecutor.java, DefaultSubagentExecutor.java, LlmSkillExecutor.java, ReActLlmDeriver.java and ChunkAggregator.java — in L-16, L-22 and L-23's bodies, in max-tokens-truncation-reporting.md (at 9b642cc) and in reasoning-delta-stream.md / reasoning-model-enablement.md — drift as designed. The build lists the ones its diff moves.
  • docs/design/README.md §2, the agent-execution table: this run adds one row after :43. Rows other runs add to the same tables conflict and are resolved at merge, as the task says. §3 is design-record-exemption's and is not touched.
  • The committed record's own citations stay at c561e17, byte-exact, as its header says; they are not recounted at merge.
  • llm-config-surface-open-items.md's title and its docs/backlog/README.md row conflict with anthropic-default-model-followups (L-20, L-24, L-27, L-28); recount from the body at merge.
  • CHANGELOG.md: the new entry shifts every line below it.

9. Open questions

Not resolvable from the task statement or the code; none is silently assumed above.

  • Q1 — What a cut tool_use block looks like on the blocking Anthropic path, and on OpenAI's. Unmeasured. §6 F1–F3 show the design does not depend on it; §7.12 can settle the Anthropic half.
  • Q2 — Whether a model keeps issuing cut calls after reading the refusal. Decides how often the guard trips in practice (and whether D4's clause changes what a parent does next); not measurable here without multi-turn live runs. No decision depends on it.
  • Q3 — Who corrects thinking-reporting-and-dialect-records.md §16.8 (F-3). No run in this batch owns it.
  • Q4 — Should a turn that ran a slash skill end TRUNCATED when the skill's answer was cut? (F-2) It needs changes this run may not make; the maintainer decides whether it is worth L-26.
  • Q5 — Closed in revision 2. #122 was answered during the design phase and the task amended; this design is committed as a record with its index row (D10).
  • Q6 — L-25's register. It goes to llm-config-surface-open-items.md as L-23's pair, because that is the register this run holds IDs in. If the maintainer would rather track it elsewhere, the move is theirs.

10. Acceptance criteria → where each is met

# Criterion Met by
1 A skill's loop treats a cut response as decided in 1, pinned; ReActLlmDeriver decided and stated D1, D2; §7.6, §7.7, §7.8; L-22 closure
2 A fork cannot repeat refused iterations to maxIterations, pinned; CompletionReason decided and every reader checked D3 (readers table), D4; §7.4, §7.5
3 The Task tool's output says when a fork's answer was cut, pinned on a TRUNCATED result D6; §7.9
4 #117 items 2–5 D7 + §7.10; D8 + §7.2, §7.4, §7.7; D9; §4.2
5 L-22/L-23 closed only if met; title and index row recounted from the body D10 — closures that link the committed record; §4.3
6 Changelog entries for every behaviour change; checkAll green with numbers; four doc checks pass §4.3; §7.0, §7.11 — the full suites reported per module, and the doc checks run over the new record and its docs/design/README.md row

11. After the build — departures, corrections, and what went to the backlog

Appended 2026-09-11, after implementation. Everything above this section is the body as approved by design review round 2, and it is not edited to look prescient. Three sources feed this section: the run's build/deviations.md, the two reviews' non-blocking notes, and what was measured while building.

No decision in §3 changed. D1–D10 were built as chosen: the skill loop and the deriver refuse a cut response's calls, the skill loop marks a cut answer in its text, one StalledIterationGuard stops the turn, the fork and the skill loop, a stalled fork ends ERROR, the stop message names max_tokens for a streak of refusals, the Task tool prints a trailing Completion reason: line, the parse WARN logs no argument text, the hook claim is pinned by tests, and orca-executor.md §2.2 describes what shipped. What departed is where the fork keeps its guard, one registration the body left to the maintainer, and wording.

11.1 Where the build departed from the body

  • DV-1 — the fork's guard lives in its LoopContext, and its check is an else if on the tail cancellation check. §4.1 put the guard "beside iterationCount in runReActLoop" and the check after the tail check as an if of its own. runReActLoop was 148 lines against Checkstyle's MethodLength limit of 150, and that placement comes to about
  • The turn's loop carries a justified @SuppressWarnings("checkstyle:MethodLength"); rather than add a second one, the guard sits in LoopContext beside budgetTracker — the fork's other mutable per-execution tracker — and the tail reads if (cancelled) return INTERRUPTED; else if (the guard trips) return ERROR;, which also puts D3's ordering in the shape of the code. The method is now exactly 150 lines. Behaviour is as D3 describes, and DefaultSubagentExecutorStalledIterationTest pins it.
  • DV-2 — OrcaAgentExecutor.MAX_CONSECUTIVE_STALLED_ITERATIONS is fenced with // spotless:off. Defined by the guard's constant, the declaration is 122 characters on one line. Checkstyle's LineLength is 120, and the Eclipse formatter joins a wrapped line (join_wrapped_lines), so the wrap is kept by the toggle Spotless already enables (toggleOffOn()). Name, value (3) and compile-time-constant status are unchanged. Keeping a literal 3 beside the guard's constant was rejected: two definitions of one number is the drift the shared guard exists to prevent.
  • DV-3 — L-26 is registered (§8.1 F-2, §9 Q4). The body left for the maintainer whether "a turn that ran a slash skill whose answer was cut should end TRUNCATED" is worth an item. The build was asked to promote every open question whose consequences reach past this run into the named register, under a reserved ID, and this one does: an application reading a turn's completion reason sees COMPLETED, and changing that needs command/**. It is registered as a decision item, not decided. With it the register is 26 items, 14 open, 12 closed.
  • DV-4 — the CHANGELOG's hook bullet says what the tests pin (review 2, note 1). §4.3's draft said all of #113's "No permission check and no PermissionRequest/PreTool/PostTool hook runs for a refused call" is pinned on the turn, the fork and the skill loop. The tests count the three hooks and the tool on all three loops. The permission (allow-list) check is counted on the skill loop only: the slash-skill E2E test's allow-list entry carries a pattern, so the check must ask a counting ToolPermissionSubjectAware tool for its subject — no read after the cut iteration, at least one after the uncut one. The turn and the fork pass an empty allow-list, the validator returns before it reads anything, and no positive control is possible there; the bullet says so. (2026-09-11, #133: not true of the fork — §12.1.)
  • DV-5 — orca-executor.md wording. §2.2 states the reason continuation is not the default (merge and signature blocks) rather than §4.3's "그대로이고", because the rewrite removes the paragraph that word pointed at. The :68 sentence gained a clause sending the tool-call shape to §2.2. §1.1's diagram is untouched: its else executeToolUses line is incomplete, not false, and D9 did not list it.
  • DV-6 — TaskTool's javadoc change sits above :613. §4.1's row says both "its javadoc gives the placement reason" and "nothing above :613 changes", and the method's javadoc is at :602-612. The javadoc was edited. What the second clause protected holds: .defaultModel( is still TaskTool.java:553.
  • DV-7 — tests beyond §7. LlmSkillExecutorTruncationTest also pins D5's change beyond truncation (three iterations of a failing tool fail the skill with the plain message); TaskToolTest pins a COMPLETED result as the whole string; ChunkAggregatorTest also asserts at offset 12 for the leaking-token input; and DefaultSubagentExecutorStalledIterationTest asserts getStatus() reads FAILURE and OnStop's final answer is the stop message.
  • DV-8 — a comment corrected in passing. The turn's guard comment said a mis-counted cancellation would "finalise the turn as STALLED". There is no such reason; it now says "as a stall (ERROR)".
  • DV-9 — the dated note under the backlog index was not extended. Earlier records appended each change of the llm-config-surface-open-items.md row to the blockquote below docs/backlog/README.md's index. This work changed the row only: the rest of that file belonged to another run of the same batch. The note stays historically true.

11.2 Where the body is wrong

  • C-1 — §6 F1 and §9 Q1 left the blocking-path shape open. It is measured (§11.4): a cut tool_use arrives as a well-formed object holding only the arguments that finished. F1 is the case that happened.
  • C-2 — §4.1's DefaultSubagentExecutor row places the guard where it does not fit (DV-1).
  • C-3 — §4.1's TaskTool row contradicts itself (DV-6).
  • C-4 — §4.3's changelog bullet on the hook claim claims more than §7's tests pin (DV-4).
  • C-5 — §8.1 F-2's "not registered", and §9 Q4 (DV-3).
  • C-6 — §4.3's "On this branch alone: 25 items, 13 open, 12 closed" and the index row 25 | 13 | 12 | 0 are 26 / 14 / 12 with L-26.

11.3 The §8.1 findings and §9 questions, and which went to the backlog

The backlog items are in llm-config-surface-open-items.md; each links back here.

Item Now Why
F-1 — AgentOutput prints SUCCESS for a TRUNCATED background task, and the completion notification cuts the marker off a long answer backlog L-25 #117 item 1's defect on a background fork's path; neither file was this work's. Re-read at c561e17: AgentOutputTool.formatAgentResult prints TaskResult.getStatus(), and DefaultSubagentExecutionManager.truncateDetail keeps the first 500 characters
F-2 / Q4 — a turn that ran a cut slash skill ends COMPLETED backlog L-26 DV-3
F-3 / Q3 — thinking-reporting-and-dialect-records.md §16.8 still says a fork has no guard, and the same record speaks of L-22/L-23 as open here, the L-23 closure, and the PR body No run in the batch owned that record, and both reserved IDs are used
F-4 — the CLI's SubagentResultDisplayHook parses TaskTool's text, and its test never feeds it real output here and the PR body Review 2 adds that OutputFormatter.displaySubagentResult colours every summary line by the status word, so the new line prints in the success colour under ✓ SUCCESS for a cut fork. Cosmetic; the file belonged to another run
F-5 — a slash command, and so a skill's loop, cannot be interrupted here Pre-existing; D5's guard bounds the refusal case
F-6 — max-tokens-truncation-reporting.md §8 and §11.3 describe the Task tool line and L-22/L-23 as open none An approved record, historically true
F-7 — a single refused call in a skill's loop shows on no terminal the L-22 closure and the CHANGELOG The command path has no event channel for any skill call, refused or run
Q1 — the blocking-path shape measured (§11.4)
Q2 — whether a model keeps issuing cut calls after a refusal the L-23 closure Not measurable without multi-turn live runs; no decision depends on it
Q6 — L-25's register llm-config-surface-open-items.md As proposed

Review 2's note on TurnVocabularyArchitectureTest was checked: nothing added under at.aimon.core.subagent.. or at.aimon.core.tools.task.. is named for a turn (createStalledResult, stalledIterationGuard), and the rule ran in checkAll (§11.4).

11.4 What was measured

Rule five, before the fix. StalledIterationGuard and its unit test went in first, wired to no loop, and every §7 test ran against the unchanged loops: 126 tests in ten classes, 15 failed, 0 skipped. Each failure is one §7.0 predicted, on the value it named:

  • the skill loop — a cut call ran on the fallback path (1 execution); the bound dispatcher was handed the cut call (["t1", "t2"] where ["t2"] was expected); a cut answer had no marker; three cut tool responses and three failing tool iterations both ended in success; the reasoning-clause test found no max_tokens WARN at all;
  • the slash-skill E2E test — [1, 1, 1, 1, 1] after the cut iteration, for PermissionRequest, PreTool, PostTool, the tool and the allow-list subject reads;
  • the deriver — an observation was persisted from the cut call;
  • the fork — both stall tests ended COMPLETED;
  • the turn — the refused-only stop message had no clause;
  • the Task tool — no Completion reason: line for TRUNCATED or for ERROR;
  • the parse WARN — it held Jackson's message, Unrecognized token 'SECRETTOKENxyz': …, and no (N chars).

As §7.0 predicted, the turn's and the fork's hook-count tests, the plain-message byte test, the fork's recovery, cancellation and maxIterations(2) tests, the skill's uncut-answer and recovery tests and the COMPLETED Task tool test passed before the fix. After it, the same ten classes were 126 of 126 green.

The live probe (§7.12). One billed request, 2026-09-11T05:48:54Z, POST https://api.anthropic.com/v1/messages.

  • Request: model: claude-haiku-4-5, max_tokens: 60, stream: false, one tool write_file(path, content) with both properties required, forced by tool_choice, and one user message asking for a 400-word poem about the sea in /tmp/sea.txt. The key was read into a process-substitution header and never printed or exported.
  • Response: HTTP 200, request-id: req_011Cew8JyrxugAE6PL7atguf, served as claude-haiku-4-5-20251001, stop_reason: max_tokens, output_tokens: 60.
  • content[]: one block, {"type": "tool_use", "name": "write_file", "input": {"path": "/tmp/sea.txt"}, …}.

The cut block is neither dropped, nor empty, nor unparsable: it is a well-formed object holding the argument that finished and missing the required one that did not. AnthropicLlmClient.convertResponse copies that input into the ToolUse (read from the code, not run on this response), so before this change a skill's loop would have dispatched write_file with a path and no content, and no parse WARN would have fired. #113's streaming probe saw the same prefix as unclosed JSON. One request is an observation, not a guarantee, and no decision above depends on it.

The gates. ./gradlew format, then ./gradlew checkAll with no provider key in the environment: BUILD SUCCESSFUL, 240 actionable tasks (115 executed, 125 up to date), and every module's test task executed in that run. 21 modules reported 10,979 tests, 0 failed, 72 skipped — aimon-core 8,201 (2 skipped) and aimon-workflow-graaljs 41 among them, so the wider guards of D3 and D5 flipped no existing test. The other skips are aimon-llm-anthropic 25 and aimon-llm-openai 17, whose live classes need a key, and aimon-sandbox-docker and aimon-sandbox-kubernetes 14 each. The first Checkstyle run failed on DV-2's line, before the toggle. The four doc checks passed with this record in the tree — check-doc-links.py, check-backlog-registers.py (llm-config-surface-open-items.md at 26 / 14 / 12 / 0), check-translation-staleness.py and check-translation-structure.py — and so did mkdocs build --strict.

12. After #133 — DV-4's reason was false for the fork, and what became of DV-1, DV-2, F-3 and F-4

Appended 2026-09-11 by #133, which collected three non-blocking notes from this work's build review and the two findings §11.3 sent to the PR body (F-3, F-4). No decision in §3 changed, and nothing above is rewritten. §11.1 DV-4 carries one struck-through correction mark pointing here, the form ../README.md §3.4 allows. The file:line citations below read at the commit that adds this section, as §3.4 dates a line after the boundary; #133 moves none of the lines they name.

12.1 DV-4 — a fork does not pass an empty allow-list

DV-4 said the turn and the fork pass an empty allow-list, so the permission check could be counted on the skill loop only. That is true of the turn: OrcaAgentExecutor.dispatchSingleTool passes allowedTools(List.of()) (OrcaAgentExecutor.java:2498). It is false of the fork: DefaultSubagentExecutor.executeSingleTool passes subagent.getAllowedTools() (DefaultSubagentExecutor.java:920), which a definition's tools: fills (MarkdownSubagentParser.java:73, SubagentMetadata.java:144-147). What was empty was the fork test's fixture, which declared no tools. With an entry that carries a pattern, DefaultToolPermissionValidator.isAllowed gets past its empty-list return (:184) and its pattern-less return (:195) and asks the tool for its subject (:199) — the positive control §7.7's test built for the skill loop.

133 added it for the fork. DefaultSubagentExecutorTruncationTest.noHookAndNoAllowListCheckRunsForARefusedCall

(formerly noHookRunsForARefusedCall) gives the subagent the entry Checked(count) and a tool that counts subject reads: none after the cut iteration, at least one after the uncut one. Written without the pattern, the same test fails on that last read (§12.4). The CHANGELOG bullet DV-4 wrote now counts the check on the fork and the skill loop and names the turn alone as the loop that cannot. The slash-skill E2E test's comment no longer calls the skill loop the only one with a non-empty allow-list. §11.2 C-4 and §11.4 stand as written.

12.2 The other follow-ups

§11 What it left Now
DV-1 LoopContext's field comment called the fork's guard "The turn's death-spiral guard", and DefaultSubagentExecutorStalledIterationTest's class comment said a fork stops "with the turn's guard" Both say the guard is the fork's own per-execution instance of the shared StalledIterationGuard (../../overview/glossary.md §4)
DV-2 The fence held the constant's fourteen-line javadoc as well as its two-line declaration, so an edit to that javadoc was neither formatted by ./gradlew format nor flagged by checkFormat The fence holds the declaration only (§12.4)
F-3 thinking-reporting-and-dialect-records.md §16.8 and §16.10 still presented a fork as guardless and L-22 · L-23 as open Corrected in that record's §16.11
F-4 The CLI rendered a cut fork's Completion reason: line in the success colour, and no aimon-cli test read real TaskTool output §12.3

12.3 F-4 — how the CLI shows a cut fork's Completion reason: line

The line gets its own colour. With colour output on it is yellow when the status is SUCCESS, and red, as before, when it is FAILURE. The header, the answer and every line with colour output off are unchanged. SubagentResultDisplayHook splits a trailing reason line off the summary — only when the name is a CompletionReason that is not isSuccessful(), the condition TaskTool prints the line on — and hands it to OutputFormatter.displaySubagentCompletionReason.

Rejected: a warning glyph (still success-coloured without the colour change, and it alters plain-text output); the summary coloured by the reason (it recolours the answer, not the one line that says it is incomplete); the header coloured by the reason (the header prints the status word D6 kept SUCCESS).

Pinned on TaskTool's own output. SubagentResultDisplayHookTest runs TaskTool over a mocked execution manager and feeds the hook what it prints. The test supplies values, never labels, so a change to TaskTool's text that the hook stops parsing fails in aimon-cli.

12.4 What was measured

The fork's control, with and without the pattern. With the entry Checked(count), DefaultSubagentExecutorTruncationTest ran 6 tests with none failed, against fork code that #133 did not change. With the entry written Checked, no pattern, the same class ran 6 and failed 1: the new test, at its last assertion, "Expecting actual: 0 to be greater than: 0". Its other counts read as they did with the pattern. So the fifth count measures the allow-list check, and nothing else on the fork's path reads the subject. The slash-skill E2E class (4 tests) and DefaultSubagentExecutorStalledIterationTest (4) passed after their comment changes.

The fence. The probe was one javadoc line whose leading * sat two columns left: the formatter normalises that, and Checkstyle does not check it.

Step File spotlessCheck spotlessApply
Control Old fence; the probe in TRUNCATION_MARKER's javadoc, outside any fence fails, naming OrcaAgentExecutor.java
The defect Old fence; the probe in the constant's javadoc, inside the fence passes leaves the probe in place
The fix Fence narrowed to the declaration, no probe passes changes nothing, run twice; the declaration stays on two lines
The fix, probed Narrowed fence; the probe in the constant's javadoc, now outside the fence fails, naming OrcaAgentExecutor.java restores the narrowed file byte for byte

checkstyleMain on aimon-core passed with the narrowed shape: 1,138 files, no error, none in OrcaAgentExecutor. The file keeps its 3,447 lines, so no line below the fence moves. The fallback — the wide fence with a comment saying why the javadoc must sit inside — was not needed.

Rule five, before the CLI fix. OutputFormatter.displaySubagentCompletionReason went in with an empty body and the hook unchanged, and the new tests ran against that: SubagentResultDisplayHookTest and OutputFormatterTest, 48 tests, 6 failed, 0 skipped. Each failure was the one predicted. The hook tests for a cut and for a stalled fork saw a summary that still ended with the reason line. The colour test found the line printed ESC[32m, green. The formatter's colour-off, yellow and red tests found nothing printed. The completed fork's hook test and the showToolCalls test passed before and after. With the fix, the same two classes ran 48 of 48 green.

The gates. ./gradlew format changed nothing, and ./gradlew checkAll with no provider key in the environment passed: BUILD SUCCESSFUL, 240 actionable tasks (100 executed, 140 up to date), and every module's test task that has sources executed in that run. 21 modules reported 10,992 tests, 0 failed, 72 skipped — aimon-core 8,201 (2 skipped) and aimon-cli 482 among them. The other skips are aimon-llm-anthropic 25 and aimon-llm-openai 17, whose live classes need a key, and aimon-sandbox-docker and aimon-sandbox-kubernetes 14 each. The four doc checks and mkdocs build --strict passed with this section in the tree.